[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Nov 2010 08:40:15 -0800 (PST) |
My attempts to send this message are quickly becoming a
comedy of errors. First, I forget to CC Joe, then the
mailing list comes back with "Please trim the recipient
list; it is too long." In the interest of democracy, I am
sending this a third time (now slightly updated), with no
CC's. So better to reply to this email in case the
mailing list complains to you as well.
- Mark
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Mark Polesky wrote:
> Okay, I think enough votes are in to finalize the most
> recent proposal:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-11/msg00137.html
I almost forgot... Can we have one last vote among these
two choices?
1) within-group-staff-staff-spacing
2) withingroup-staff-staff-spacing
In this thread, there are at least 11 people with a vested
interest (I added Joe even though he's been silent). Anyone
else wanting to vote, feel free to add your name to this
list. Please enter your preference among the 2 choices
above. I've already entered mine.
Carl:
David:
James:
Jan:
Jean-Charles:
Joe:
Keith:
Mark: 1
Trevor:
Valentin: 1*
Werner: 2
*was 2, then changed it to 1? Which one is it?
Thanks
- Mark
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, (continued)
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props,
Mark Polesky <=
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2010/11/07
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, David Kastrup, 2010/11/07
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Mark Polesky, 2010/11/07