[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Converting ly to musicxml

From: cab
Subject: Re: Converting ly to musicxml
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:32:15 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10

Le 10/07/2011 11:14, address@hidden a écrit :
> On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:56 AM, cab wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have been using lilypond for 3 years in my projects:
>> (this is the website on which I am currently
>> working on), and (the sister site) in which
>> I convert musicxml to lilypond and then I put the score online.
>> The thing is that the musicxml format is not the one most people use,
>> so I can't put on many scores online...
>> However I think it would be easier to convert ly to musicxml
>> (in fact i want to convert like this : midi -> ly -> musicxml).
>> Converting from midi to ly is possible, but ly to musicxml has never
>> been done... So my plan is to program it myself
>> I think I would do it in python as musicxml2ly is also written in python.
>> Do you have anything to say about it ?
>> Will I face some problems I have not thaught of?
>> Have I missed anything that would really make this task easier?
>> If I manage to do it , will it be possible to add it in the source tree ?
>> And a last request , can you link my website ( or
>> or both) from your website?
>> Thanks really much for your help
>> Dang Nguyen Bac
> Dear Dang Nguyen,
> This is something I proposed to the French users list earlier this year and 
> it got a lukewarm response from the community (save several well-thought-out 
> responses from Scheme and/or musicxml and/or accessibility enthusiasts).  I 
> have started some sketches for this type of code, and it is certainly 
> possible, especially if you do not include position information.  Contact me 
> if you'd like to talk more about this and I'll dig up the sketches I've 
> already done in Scheme.
> Cheers,
> MS

Dear Mike,

Actually, I am really interested, but I am wondering why you used scheme
, is it because you are doing this recursively ?
Is it because it is easier to parse ly files with scheme (I don't know
this language yet ) ?

Thanks really much

Dang Nguyen Bac

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]