[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:41:13 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Patrick Welche <address@hidden> writes:
> so the -R made it, and all is well :-)
>
> I can't check the opposite though: do systems that don't want rpath get
> one now?
Yes, they probably do. Perhaps the libtool guys can chime in on
whether the patch was a good idea.
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/17
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Patrick Welche, 2006/07/17
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Albert Chin, 2006/07/21
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Russ Allbery, 2006/07/20
Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Albert Chin, 2006/07/19