[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath
From: |
Braden McDaniel |
Subject: |
Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:54:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs |
Quoting Paul Eggert <address@hidden>:
> Patrick Welche <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > so the -R made it, and all is well :-)
> >
> > I can't check the opposite though: do systems that don't want rpath get
> > one now?
>
> Yes, they probably do. Perhaps the libtool guys can chime in on
> whether the patch was a good idea.
(Not a libtool developer.)
This looks suspiciously like the -rpath that's been hosing me when I try to link
with a libGL outside the X11 directories (specifically, Mesa built in my home
directory).
--
Braden McDaniel e-mail: <address@hidden>
<http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <address@hidden>
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/17
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Patrick Welche, 2006/07/17
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/17
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Albert Chin, 2006/07/21
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Russ Allbery, 2006/07/20
Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Albert Chin, 2006/07/19