[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnuj
From: |
Dalibor Topic |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp? |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Apr 2003 07:30:08 -0700 (PDT) |
--- Nic Ferrier <address@hidden> wrote:
> Dalibor Topic <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Salut Arnaud,
> >
> > --- Arnaud Vandyck <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Nic Ferrier <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > GNUJAXP is under development, I am working on the build system and
> > > > when I've done that I'll be working on bugs and missing features.
> > >
> > > Why don't you base the build system on jakarta-ant? Apache License is
> > > also free software, isn't it?
> >
> > Kind of, but GPL incompatible according to the FSF.
> >
> > And I don't know if any free VM can really run latest/any Ant releases all
> that
> > well (kaffe can with a bit of prodding). I've had a long, boring discussion
> on
> > that topic (and how far GPL applies accross interpreter boundaries, the
> annual
> > mild licensing flamewar) with a debian developer archived here
> > http://www.kaffe.org/pipermail/kaffe/2002-August/027705.html . In short, if
> you
> > use Ant, you automatically kick yourself out of debian-free as long as no
> other
> > VM can 'legally'[1] run ant.
>
> If we really cared we would get ANT builds up and running on free VMs.
>
> But none of the contributing hackers really likes ANT much. It's no
> suprise, make is a GNU tool. Why should we have to download ANT.
>
>
> I would have no problem including an ANT build in GNUJAXP if someone
> wants to make one. But I don't have the time.
Yep. And since kaffe doesn't use ant for the class library build, there is no
incentive for me as a GNUJAXP integrator to provide one.
GNU Automake seems to be getting better and better at Java support. I'm looking
forward to JAR support.
cheers,
dalibor topic
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
- [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?, Arnaud Vandyck, 2003/04/12
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?, Dalibor Topic, 2003/04/13
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?, Nic Ferrier, 2003/04/13
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?,
Dalibor Topic <=
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?, Nic Ferrier, 2003/04/13
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?, Nic Ferrier, 2003/04/13
- gnujaxp build system (was: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?), Arnaud Vandyck, 2003/04/13
- Re: gnujaxp build system (was: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?), Dalibor Topic, 2003/04/13
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: gnujaxp build system, Arnaud Vandyck, 2003/04/13
- Re: gnujaxp build system (was: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?), Nic Ferrier, 2003/04/13
- Re: gnujaxp build system (was: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?), Brian Jones, 2003/04/13
- Re: gnujaxp build system (was: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?), Dalibor Topic, 2003/04/14
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?, Tom Tromey, 2003/04/13