directory-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [directory-discuss] Are license files and notices mandatory?


From: David Hedlund
Subject: Re: [directory-discuss] Are license files and notices mandatory?
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:12:38 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/52.8.0


On 2018-07-18 08:24, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>   > * https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-plus/versions/:
>   > "Source code released under GNU General Public License, version 3.0
>   > (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html)"
>
> Mozilla's summary may be inaccurate about this.
> We should NEVER assume it is accurate,
> especially not when it says something we don't like!
>
> Can you find the adblock-plus source repo
> and investigate what it has in the way of GPL version information?
> I'd like a complete list of what it has.
>
https://hg.adblockplus.org/adblockplus/file/tip/COPYING exist, but there
is no COPYING file included in Adblock Plus for Firefox:
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/file/1018006/adblock_plus-3.2-an+fx.xpi



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]