directory-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [directory-discuss] Are license files and notices mandatory?


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: [directory-discuss] Are license files and notices mandatory?
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 23:02:15 -0400

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > > "This file is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
  > > it under the terms of the GNU General Public License"?

  > grep -l "it under the terms of the GNU General Public License" -r
  > adblockplus/ | sort
  > adblockplus/addChecksum.py
  > adblockplus/chrome/content/objtabs.css
  > adblockplus/chrome/content/ui/composer.js
  > adblockplus/chrome/content/ui/composer.xul
  > adblockplus/chrome/content/ui/fennecSettings.xul

I see there are plenty of such notices.

Each notice says which GPL version or versions apply.
What do they say?  Is it "version 3" or is it "version 3 or any later"?

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]