Re: [directory-discuss] Are license files and notices mandatory?

[Richard Stallman]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > https://hg.adblockplus.org/adblockplus/file/tip/COPYING

Is that the master source repo?

  > https://hg.adblockplus.org/adblockplus/file/tip/COPYING exist,

That is good.

Is there anything in that repo that says "This software is
released under the GNU GPL"?

What about license notices in source files?
Do the indi source files in the repo have license notices,
"This file is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License"?


  > 
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/file/1018006/adblock_plus-3.2-an+fx.xpi

That is secondary; the developers' source repo is primary.
So let's focus concentrate on that, and only that.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)