[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:38:37 -0600 (MDT) |
That kind of heuristic is bound to trip some people, I think. It's
difficult to set a threshold that will suit everyone. It's also
difficult for users to set such a threshold, if we give them an
option.
A threshold may be the wrong way to decide, but it could be that a
mixture CRLFs with some extra CRs should be accepted as DOS-style.
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stephen Gildea, 2002/04/26
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/26
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/26
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/27
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/28
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/29
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/29
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/29
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/30
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/30