[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:39:54 -0400 |
> > Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:38:37 -0600 (MDT)
> > From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> >
> > it could be that a mixture CRLFs with some extra CRs should be
> > accepted as DOS-style.
>
> Are we sure that Mac users (where a single CR is the EOL character)
> won't object this?
Mac users don't have LFs at all so there shouldn't be any ambiguity.
If there is no LFs and some CRs -> Mac.
If all the LFs are preceded with CR -> Dos.
Else -> Unix.
Stefan
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/26
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stephen Gildea, 2002/04/26
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/26
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/27
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/28
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/29
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/29
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/29
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/30
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/30
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/28