Re: next-error-last-buffer

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Thu, 13 May 2004, address@hidden wrote:

> Defining rules by a list would be good.  For example:
> 
> (defcustom next-error-find-buffer-functions
>   '(next-error-visible-buffer         ; predefined function
>     next-error-find-buffer-function   ; user-defined
>     next-error-last-buffer            ; predefined function
>     ...)
>   :type '(repeat symbol))
> 
> But isn't this unnecessarily complicated?

I think it's necessary in order to accomodate both you and RMS.

Ted