[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error-last-buffer
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: next-error-last-buffer |
Date: |
Thu, 13 May 2004 08:34:28 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:
>> (display-buffer outbuf nil t)
>> ^--- consider windows on all frames
>>
>> Why should compilation insist on switching frames? Shouldn't
>> `display-buffer-reuse-frames' define the user preference instead?
>
> It's not `switching frames', it's _using_ an existing compilation buffer
> in a different frame.
>
> This is good -- the previous behavior (which didn't do that) was very
> annoying: if you happened to have a *compilation* buffer displayed in
> another frame, starting a compilation would none-the-less insist on
> popping up another window in _this_ frame, resulting in two redundant
> windows showing the *compilation* buffer.
So what? I have no objection to having two compilation buffers
on different frames.
But the current behavior is more annoying: another frame is raised over
the current frame, but is not activated. So you see the inactive
frame with the point in the other frame.
>> So I think `display-buffer' should use the default values:
>
> No.
But there is the variable `display-buffer-reuse-frames' for users who
like to reuse windows on another frames. I even have no objections
to changing its default value to t, since I can change it to nil in .emacs.
But there is no way to ignore the frame argument of `display-buffer'
if it's specified explicitly.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, (continued)
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/10
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/11
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/11
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/12
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/12
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/14
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/14
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/15
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/15
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/15
Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/24