[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error-last-buffer
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: next-error-last-buffer |
Date: |
Fri, 14 May 2004 05:21:28 -0400 |
With that in mind, why not make the default behavior a list of symbols
as Juri and I suggested, with a sensible default as you suggest?
Let's change the default behavior and see if anyone is really unhappy
afterwards.
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, (continued)
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/12
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/14
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/15
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/15
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/15
Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/24