[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pretest 22.0.100
From: |
Jay Belanger |
Subject: |
Re: pretest 22.0.100 |
Date: |
Thu, 17 May 2007 08:39:38 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
...
> If it was deliberate, then it was not a mistake. And history shows that
> Emacs has always had version numbers, not version strings.
If that were the case, shouldn't 22.0.99 be followed by 22.0.991
rather than 22.0.990 or 22.0.100?
Jay
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, (continued)
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Nick Roberts, 2007/05/14
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Andreas Schwab, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Jason Rumney, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Jason Rumney, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Ralf Angeli, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Ulrich Mueller, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100,
Jay Belanger <=
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/17
- Another pretest after 22.0.99 (was: pretest 22.0.100), Reiner Steib, 2007/05/17
Re: We can use python.el, Michaƫl Cadilhac, 2007/05/12