[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pretest 22.0.100

From: Jay Belanger
Subject: Re: pretest 22.0.100
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 08:39:38 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
> If it was deliberate, then it was not a mistake. And history shows that
> Emacs has always had version numbers, not version strings.

If that were the case, shouldn't 22.0.99 be followed by 22.0.991
rather than 22.0.990 or 22.0.100?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]