[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: threads and kill-buffer
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: threads and kill-buffer |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 08:24:38 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Tom Tromey <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:28:19 -0400
>
> >> I suppose we may also want a new predicate to detect this state.
> > At least internally, yes. Not sure we should expose that to Lisp.
>
> Can someone explain to me why don't want to make kill-buffer signal an error?
Because, if we find a solution that doesn't signal an error, it will
be better: existing code will still work.
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, (continued)
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/06
Re: threads and kill-buffer, SAKURAI Masashi, 2012/09/04
Re: threads and kill-buffer, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06