[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: threads and kill-buffer
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: threads and kill-buffer |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 08:32:01 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> >> I suppose we may also want a new predicate to detect this state.
>> > At least internally, yes. Not sure we should expose that to Lisp.
>> Can someone explain to me why don't want to make kill-buffer signal
>> an error?
> Because, if we find a solution that doesn't signal an error, it will
> be better: existing code will still work.
I wonder/doubt if there is any existing working code which would
be affected.
Stefan
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, (continued)
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer,
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: threads and kill-buffer, SAKURAI Masashi, 2012/09/04
Re: threads and kill-buffer, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/05
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, martin rudalics, 2012/09/06
- Re: threads and kill-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/06