Re: threads and kill-buffer

[martin rudalics]

>> Suppose *Backtrace* is current in thread A and gets killed by thread B.
>
> Why does it get killed?

Because killing a buffer was part of the OP's scenario.  In the case at
hand suppose it's killed because the user quits the debugger.

>> Before making another buffer current for A, a debugger buffer must be
>> revived for B.
>
> Why is there a need to make "another buffer current for A"?.  And why
> "a debugger buffer must be revived for B"?  The "must" part is
> particularly confusing.

Because of a bug in thread B causing it to enter the debugger.

>> Would that be a different buffer from the *Backtrace* seen in A?
>
> Yes.

After trying to understand the internals of `debug' in the past days,
I'd be curious how this could be done.

martin