Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?

[Nix]

On 19 Sep 2012, Sam Steingold uttered the following:

>> * Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> [2012-09-18 08:44:39 -0400]:
>>
>> As mentioned in my reply there, the two aren't quite compatible
>> (because (lexical-let ((tab-width 4)) foo) will be a lexical binding,
>
> are you seriously saying that lexical-let ignores defvar?!

If it had suddenly changed to make dynamic bindings of defvarred
variables, that might well have broken existing code. lexical-let
is a lot older than native support for lexical binding.

-- 
NULL && (void)