[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:12:38 -0400 |
This said, there can be good reasons to force a lexical binding, when
you fear that the code might be run in a context where the variable
might happen to be defvar'd.
I am very skeptical of that claim. It seems to me that if your local
variable is defvar'd by some other code, that is a kind of name
collision and that other code should use a different name which isn't
likely to collide with local variables.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
- Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Tomohiro Matsuyama, 2012/09/18
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/18
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Richard Stallman, 2012/09/18
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/18
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/19
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Sam Steingold, 2012/09/19
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/19
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Sam Steingold, 2012/09/20
Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Sam Steingold, 2012/09/18
Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Tomohiro Matsuyama, 2012/09/21