[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:01:20 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
> This said, there can be good reasons to force a lexical binding, when
> you fear that the code might be run in a context where the variable
> might happen to be defvar'd.
> I am very skeptical of that claim. It seems to me that if your local
> variable is defvar'd by some other code, that is a kind of name
> collision and that other code should use a different name which isn't
> likely to collide with local variables.
Agreed, but you can't always control "other code".
This said, I don't know of any situation where lexical-let was used for
that reason.
Stefan
- Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Tomohiro Matsuyama, 2012/09/18
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/18
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Richard Stallman, 2012/09/18
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/18
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Richard Stallman, 2012/09/19
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Sam Steingold, 2012/09/19
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/19
- Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Sam Steingold, 2012/09/20
Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Sam Steingold, 2012/09/18
Re: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ?, Tomohiro Matsuyama, 2012/09/21