[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:51:06 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:36:44 +0100 David Engster <address@hidden> wrote:
DE> Ted Zlatanov writes:
>> - the Gnus project has a person dedicated to Bazaar-Git bidirectional
>> synchronization; it is a very demanding task for the rest of us.
DE> Well, I don't believe that git will make cross-project merges easier, at
DE> least not until someone shows me how (and don't just say "submodules",
DE> please ;-) ).
The challenge for me is matching Bazaar and Git commits and
synchronizing them because I don't know Bazaar and don't use it for any
other purpose. I am pretty sure that's the case for the rest of the
Gnus contributors (Julien is one of them; Lars doesn't like Bazaar much
IIRC; we chose Git over Bazaar years ago and have not regretted it).
For this specific case, `git filter-branch' will probably be used to
rewrite paths the way you describe, but that's a technical detail.
Git-Git sync is just much easier logistically.
Ted
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, (continued)
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Leo Liu, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, John Wiegley, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Julien Danjou, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Julien Danjou, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Andreas Schwab, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/28
- Abolishing ChangeLog files (was: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development), Christopher Schmidt, 2013/03/28