[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development
From: |
Romain Francoise |
Subject: |
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:54:03 +0100 |
"John Wiegley" <address@hidden> writes:
> I think Git presents us with a pretty good answer to each of these
> points, in terms of Emacs development.
You can work on Emacs using Git today, the Git mirror is an accurate
conversion of what's in Bazaar and is updated at a reasonable frequency.
When I did the ACL stuff last year I had everything in Git and only used
Bazaar once, to install my changes (after several rounds of review).
I hate to play devil's advocate, I'm all for a switch to Git. But at least
from my experience, having the code in Bazaar is only a minor
inconvenience. I imagine that the same would apply to a majority of
potential contributors if we just encouraged people to use the Git mirror
instead of Bazaar.
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, (continued)
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, John Yates, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Allen S. Rout, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Josh, 2013/03/27
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/27
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Leo Liu, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, John Wiegley, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development,
Romain Francoise <=
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2013/03/27
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/27
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Julien Danjou, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Julien Danjou, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/27