[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:39:43 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Well, I don't believe that git will make cross-project merges easier, at
>> least not until someone shows me how (and don't just say "submodules",
>> please ;-) ).
> I'm pretty sure it does make this easier:
> http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Subtree-Merging
The core of the problem is bidirectional merging. AFAIK none of the
current DVCS have an answer for that. Subtree merging is nice, but it's
still unidirectional.
For bidirectional merging, you end up having to do some of the work
outside of the DVCS proper, in which case having Bazaar on one side and
Git on the other doesn't make much difference. Especially since you can
use things like bzr-git to translate a branch from one system to
the other.
Stefan
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, (continued)
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, John Wiegley, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Julien Danjou, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Julien Danjou, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stephen Leake, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Andreas Schwab, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, David Engster, 2013/03/28
- Abolishing ChangeLog files (was: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development), Christopher Schmidt, 2013/03/28
- Re: Abolishing ChangeLog files, Thierry Volpiatto, 2013/03/28
- Re: Abolishing ChangeLog files, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/28