Re: Docstring of make-symbolic-link

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 09:41:49 +0200
> Cc: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>, Emacs developers <address@hidden>
> 
> I'm partial to LINKNAME. I find it much more descriptive and to the
> point that NEWNAME.

OK, so we agree.

> > But
> > whatever you do, let's do that on master, as the first pretest of
> > Emacs 26.3 is already out, and I'd prefer to release it VSN, if
> > possible.
> 
> Fixing it to LINKNAME is just adjusting the docstring and one info
> file, so it shouldn't be a problem. I thought documentation fixes and
> typos are allowed during the pretest? Or do you really prefer even
> that change to go to the master?

If this is the change, then yes, emacs-26 should be fine for it.  But
let's first wait for a while, to let others object, and then decide.