Re: Question about completion behavior

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:11:59 +0100
> From: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> What I propose is:
> 
> 1. no unique        (shows or update completions)
> 2. unique common    (complete-common and UPDATE completions)
> 3. unique candidate (complete and hides completion)
> 4. unique common but completion is a valid entry (complete-common and hides 
> completion)
> 
> Is this behavior fine??

Sorry, I don't think I understand what you mean by each of the
descriptions "unique common", "unique candidate", etc.  And I don't
want to guess wrongly.  So I cannot answer your question; please
describe each situation as accurately as you can, to make the
discussion effective and useful.

Thanks.