[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question about completion behavior

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Question about completion behavior
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:10:57 +0200

> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:11:59 +0100
> From: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> What I propose is:
> 1. no unique        (shows or update completions)
> 2. unique common    (complete-common and UPDATE completions)
> 3. unique candidate (complete and hides completion)
> 4. unique common but completion is a valid entry (complete-common and hides 
> completion)
> Is this behavior fine??

Sorry, I don't think I understand what you mean by each of the
descriptions "unique common", "unique candidate", etc.  And I don't
want to guess wrongly.  So I cannot answer your question; please
describe each situation as accurately as you can, to make the
discussion effective and useful.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]