Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:11:59 +0100
From: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
What I propose is:
1. no unique (shows or update completions)
2. unique common (complete-common and UPDATE completions)
3. unique candidate (complete and hides completion)
4. unique common but completion is a valid entry (complete-common and hides
completion)
Is this behavior fine??
Sorry, I don't think I understand what you mean by each of the
descriptions "unique common", "unique candidate", etc. And I don't
want to guess wrongly. So I cannot answer your question; please
describe each situation as accurately as you can, to make the
discussion effective and useful.
Thanks.