Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 08.10.2022 01:49, Richard Stallman wrote:
> We could have a Parse Code feature which uses can enable.  For some
> actions and languages, it would use Eglot, and for others it would use
> Semantic, but users should not have to know about those two (unless
> they are curious).

I'm not aware of any languages where Semantic is universally (meaning, 
for most users) a better option.

It can still serve those who have written a custom grammar for some 
domain-specific language, and those who have been using it for a while, 
and not willing to switch.

In most other cases, Eglot (or LSP-Mode) should be preferred. There are 
other third-party language support packages (such as Cider for Clojure 
or Robe for Ruby) which some consider superior, but neither has been 
proposed for inclusion, so I'm just mentioning that for completeness.