Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?

[Po Lu]

chad <yandros@gmail.com> writes:

> The high-level idea in both cases is to enhance existing emacs
> facilities (including those that are enabled by default, those that
> are shipped with emacs but must be enabled by the user, and those that
> are packaged separately from the emacs core) by adding a more in-depth
> comprehension of the code the user is examining, modifying, writing,
> etc.

That may be true of Eglot, but not of Semantic.  Type "C-c , C-h" and
see for yourself.