Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?

[Richard Stallman]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > > To be fair, eglot does a bit more than just being a LSP client.  It
  > > enables lots of extra fluff.  E.g., it popups up a docstring in the
  > > mini-buffer using eldoc, it highlights broke code using flymake,
  > > enables completion using company-mode if that is used, etc -- that is
  > > quite a bit more than just a simple client interface.

  > It provides LSP client services to several Emacs features, yes.
  > Having a client without this glue would be much less useful, because
  > it would mean we'd need to develop that ourselves.

I agree.  I would not suggest removing any of Eglot's functionality.
I'd expect just the opposite -- that people would continue making 
a range of Emacs features make use of Eglot when that is useful.

The name I proposed, "Parse Code", fits this generality.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)