[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Installing cond* in core
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Installing cond* in core |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Jan 2024 14:19:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Controversial things should be discussed _before_ being
> committed to master, before their designs are finalised,
> not afterwards.
I think most people will agree completely.
It is beneficial to software, but also to people.
Often what is important to people is they get to say their
views and be heard. Even if what actually happens after that
is something opposite to their point of view, it will be much
easier for them to take and let go of.
People shouldn't feel "first people ignores me, then I have to
deal with all the problems that came from it".
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: Installing cond* in core, (continued)
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/28
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/01/28
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/28
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/28
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/01/28
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/29
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/28
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/28
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/28
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/29
- Re: Installing cond* in core,
Emanuel Berg <=
Re: Installing cond* in core, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/27
Re: Installing cond* in core, Emanuel Berg, 2024/01/28
Re: Installing cond* in core, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/29