Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 17:39:14 +0800
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > No, I mean a real person who has a Windows 98 system they use, without
> > usp10.dll on it.  As I already wrote, I _was_ such a person, years
> > ago, and I had usp10.dll on my computer.
> >
> > I understand that it is easy to remove or rename usp10.dll and trigger
> > the problem, but I'm not interested in fixing such "artificial"
> > situations.
> 
> A fresh installation of Windows 98 from an image of its official retail
> CD-ROM contains _no_ USP10.DLL, and Emacs as it is consequently will not
> link.  Hardly artificial, I believe.

Please reread what I wrote in previous messages, I think I explained
why we can expect usp10.dll to be available on any Windows 98 system
that is in actual use.