Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 21:10:37 +0800
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Please reread what I wrote in previous messages, I think I explained
> > why we can expect usp10.dll to be available on any Windows 98 system
> > that is in actual use.
> 
> So far as existing installations that we're aware of are concerned, this
> is true.  Hence I'm not insisting on the Uniscribe change appearing in
> Emacs 30, but what is the harm in applying it to Emacs 31?  By your own
> admission, Uniscribe is supposed to be obsolete, and the change will
> enables at least myself to test Emacs without being required to manage a
> private "DLL hell" or install Windoze Internet Exploder, whose Unix
> edition has already given me enough grief for a lifetime.

I'm not interested in complicating our code even a bit on behalf of
this non-problem.