[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: more problems with line-move
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: more problems with line-move |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:31:41 -0600 (CST) |
Richard Stallman wrote:
These problems don't happen for me. Instead, what happens
for me is that `intangible' properties seem to have no effect.
What happened?
Strange. I still get exactly the same results as in my previous
report, using emacs -q with the very latest CVS. Did you check the
value of `inhibit-point-motion-hooks'? (Should be nil after
`emacs -q', however.)
I actually did:
emacs-21.3.50 -q --eval "(blink-cursor-mode 0)" &
but that should not make any difference.
(emacs-version)
"GNU Emacs 21.3.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit)\n of 2004-03-04 on
swt40.swt.com"
>From my original report:
Visit the following file with emacs -q:
===File ~/lines=============================================
line1
line2
line3
line4
line5
line6
line7
============================================================
No trailing whitespace, but trailing newline.
M-: (put-text-property 10 18 'intangible t)
M-: (put-text-property 25 32 'intangible t)
Now there are several places where C-n and C-p get stuck.
Examples for C-n: the `line' of line2; the `l' of line5.
Example for C-p: the `i' of line6; Just after the `3' of line3.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: more problems with line-move, (continued)
- Re: more problems with line-move, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/10
- Re: more problems with line-move, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/10
- Re: more problems with line-move, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/10
- Re: more problems with line-move, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/10
- Re: more problems with line-move, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/10
- Re: more problems with line-move, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/13
- Re: more problems with line-move, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/14
- Re: more problems with line-move, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/16
- Re: more problems with line-move, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/16
Re: more problems with line-move, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/07
- Re: more problems with line-move,
Luc Teirlinck <=