Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to")

[Charles Duffy]

On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 11:30, Colin Walters wrote:
> The chances of even a comparable percentage of projects being willing
> to write extensions in Furth is basically zero.

*Ahem*.

Not furth. Perhaps in pika or a subset thereof that internally backends
into furth, or perhaps in Python or Perl or Foolang bindings which were
easier to write because they hook directly to furth primitives.

Where is this impression that people will be obliged to write Furth code
coming from? I certainly didn't get it from anything Tom's said.