Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to")

[Colin Walters]

On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 23:35 +0100, Daniel James wrote:
> Colin Walters wrote:
> > The only other actual example of where you think Furth would be useful
> > in tla that I've gleaned from this thread is "project-specific" rules.
> > My answer to that is: "exec".  You have yet to rebut that.
> 
> For me, the answer is portability. I would want an archive to be usable 
> on any platform, using only tla (or whatever client). This means an 
> embedded language. 

Guess what - Python (for example) is far more portable than tla.  You
think that somehow embedding an entirely new language in tla magically
makes it portable everywhere?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part