[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3)

[Miles Bader]

address@hidden (James Blackwell) writes:
> I've tried "submission branches" and in my experience they're a pain in
> the rear. I personally suspect that you're pushing "submission branches"
> as a political tool to discourage diverging (and eventually forking)
> branches. What better way to control development, then to encourage
> submitters to keep their patches scattered around in different branches?
> That way, patches aren't concentrated into development trees that pose a
> potential threat to tla (a.k.a. "Tom Lord's Arch"). 

You've got to be kidding.

I agree with the "submission branches are annoying" part though.

-Miles
-- 
=====
(^o^;
(()))
*This is the cute octopus virus, please copy it into your sig so it can spread.