[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to")
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to") |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Jul 2004 17:30:10 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Andrew Suffield <address@hidden>
> There are two ways to do it: complete segregation of behaviour, which
> makes it extremely difficult to do anything useful (an applet that
> cannot do IO, except via the browser UI, is of limited value), and
> partial segregation, where different bits of code have different
> access rights and can call each other across access boundaries. Java
> does the latter. It's *really* hard to get right.
Sure, that makes sense. Each new primitive is a little security
puzzle and the answer might be context specific. No silver bullet for
that.
> What Java discovered was that to do really useful sandboxing in the
> real world, you need to do it the hard way. They also discovered that
> it was really hard, and that they hadn't got it right
> (repeatedly).
Interesting.
> And Java's still growing at an exponential rate
> (codebase roughly doubles at each release).
Lovely.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Jeremy Shaw, 2004/07/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Colin Walters, 2004/07/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Ron Parker, 2004/07/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Jeremy Shaw, 2004/07/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Aaron Bentley, 2004/07/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Robert Collins, 2004/07/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Jeremy Shaw, 2004/07/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Anselm Lingnau, 2004/07/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 2004/07/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Andrew Suffield, 2004/07/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"),
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Marcus Sundman, 2004/07/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), James Blackwell, 2004/07/12
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Stefan Monnier, 2004/07/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Stéphane Payrard, 2004/07/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), James Blackwell, 2004/07/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Samium Gromoff, 2004/07/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), John Meinel, 2004/07/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/07/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), James Blackwell, 2004/07/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Samium Gromoff, 2004/07/12