[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parameterized packages
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Parameterized packages |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:43:10 +0100 |
Another thought: Gentoo has a rather complicated "Atom" syntax to convey
which parameter combination is acceptable or not.
I found it very hard to use at times.
With Guix, I believe we can do better. We can add a
#:parameter-predicate field which takes the user parameters and returns
a boolean (pass or no pass). This would give us maximal flexibility.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Parameterized packages, (continued)
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/26
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, John Soo, 2020/01/25
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/20
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/15