[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parameterized packages
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Parameterized packages |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jan 2020 12:23:14 +0100 |
Hi Pierre,
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 11:13, Pierre Neidhardt <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> zimoun <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Maybe I misread something and/or I misunderstand other thing but the
> > symbols 'video-player' and 'python' need to be defined somewhere. And
> > with this proposal adding the field 'parameters', this somewhere is
> > outside the package. Therefore, I will end up to a big mess, IMHO.
>
> I think you misread indeed :p
Maybe I misread. :-)
I am still convinced that it is not the correct design and instead be
able to partially override the package definition seems more
appropriate.
At the end, code is law. :-)
Cheers,
simon
- Re: Parameterized packages, (continued)
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/21
- Re: Parameterized packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/01/21
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/21
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/21
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/21
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/22
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/22
- Re: Parameterized packages, ison, 2020/01/24
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/26
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages,
zimoun <=
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, John Soo, 2020/01/25
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/20
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/15
Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/15