[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parameterized packages
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Parameterized packages |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jan 2020 12:50:59 +0100 |
zimoun <address@hidden> writes:
> Maybe I misread. :-)
> I am still convinced that it is not the correct design and instead be
> able to partially override the package definition seems more
> appropriate.
If you have another design in mind that supports parameter composition, please
do share :)
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Parameterized packages, (continued)
- Re: Parameterized packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/01/21
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/21
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/21
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/21
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/22
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/22
- Re: Parameterized packages, ison, 2020/01/24
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/26
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, John Soo, 2020/01/25
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/20
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/15
Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/15