[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype
From: |
Joshua N Pritikin |
Subject: |
RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype |
Date: |
Fri, 13 May 2005 09:30:08 +0530 |
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 21:05 -0500, William L. Jarrold wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2005, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > Right, that's what I was asking. So:
> >
> > create table c_commonsense (
> > id int,
> > c_commonsense_is_reversed boolean,
> > c_commonsense_statement varchar(512),
> > c_commonsense_explanation varchar(1024)
> > ) without oids;
> >
> > Those string lengths are just approximate and easy to increase if
> > needed. OK?
>
> you are the programmer but i think id would be better if the is_reversed
> var were at the end. since there are likely to be other vars that we will
> add soon.
This is a database table so we can change the layout, add, or remove
columns at any time.
> > So write a perl script or a carefully formatted file which can be used
> > to populate such a database table.
>
> you recently sent an email with an attachment named simple. you wanted
> me to tweak the item content in there to my liking. my guess is that this
> was an example of a carefully formated file which can be used to populate
> such a database table. is that correct?
Yes, but perhaps it is better separate items with \n\n and separate
fields with \n. The script I sent assumes that there is one items per
line which doesn't leave any space for the other fields.
> > OK, I have removed the part about how other people have rated this piece
> > of commonsense knowledge.
>
> well, what we actually want is both. we want...
>
> hal thinks blah.
>
> please rate this
>
> 1) high un 2) mod un 3 neut 4 mnod belief 5 hightly believable
>
> ...then after the user finishes we want some representation of what people
> think...
>
> e.g. the average believability rating that other human raters gave was 4.
> 3 other's have rated this so far.
>
> ...What do you guys think...what is the best way to rep "what other human
> raters believe" here? mean and number of respondants? mean alone? mean
> plus sdev? a histogram?....my preferennce is mean and number of
> respondants.
D'oh, well, it's easy to put whatever stats you want.
--
If you are an American then support http://fairtax.org
(Permanently replace 50,000+ pages of tax law with about 200 pages.)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, (continued)
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, William L. Jarrold, 2005/05/07
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/05/09
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, William L. Jarrold, 2005/05/10
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/05/10
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, William L. Jarrold, 2005/05/10
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/05/10
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, William L. Jarrold, 2005/05/11
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/05/11
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, William L. Jarrold, 2005/05/12
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype,
Joshua N Pritikin <=
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, William L. Jarrold, 2005/05/13
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, Josh White, 2005/05/11
- [Heartlogic-dev] HAL online, Josh White, 2005/05/11
- Re: [Heartlogic-dev] HAL online, William L. Jarrold, 2005/05/13
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] HAL online, Josh White, 2005/05/13
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] HAL online, William L. Jarrold, 2005/05/13
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] HAL online, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/05/13
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] HAL online, William L. Jarrold, 2005/05/17
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, William L. Jarrold, 2005/05/13
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] rumination prototype, Josh White, 2005/05/13