Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change

[Carl Sorensen]

On 4/19/10 11:49 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:54:15AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>>> 
>>>> Took a look at lilypond-book.py.  Did one change and am just now
>>>> recompiling.
>>>> 
>>>> The change is fairly obvious (hope it works):
>>> 
>>> It didn't, but the following on Rietveld should:
>>> 
>>> <URL:http://codereview.appspot.com/813048>
>> 
>> I like the general idea; I'll try testing it tomorrow.
>> 
>> A few caveats:
>> - we definitely need a CHANGES entry for this syntax change.
> 
> I don't know how to do this one.

Simply put an entry in Documentation/changes.tely that describes the new
lilypond-book syntax.  There's a guide to those changes in the top of
Documentation/changes.tely.

<snip>

> Done.  Somewhat annoyingly, one occurence is
> 
> Documentation/misc/CHANGES-0.1:969:     - changed \begin[options]{mudela} to
> \begin{mudela}[options]
> 
> This suggests that in version 0.1 somebody already fixed exactly that
> LaTeX syntax problem 12 years ago.  And the fix did not survive.

Maybe that's why there was that piece of code that didn't make any sense....


HTH,

Carl