[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:31:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.31-21-generic; KDE/4.4.2; i686; ; ) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 20. April 2010 18:07:50 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > And this back compatibility has no known downsides.
>
> It makes the lilypond-book code slightly more complicated? I
> agree that this isn't a big deal.
AFAICS, it's only the regexp that caters for both options before and after
{lilypond}, so I don't think it's really a complication. We might want to add
a comment in the code, though, that we kept options before {lilypond} only for
backward compatibility.
> > I guess if the old syntax is to be deprecated (and it causes problems
> > with LaTeX-aware editors and tools and startles LaTeX users, and
> > _likely_ ), this deprecation needs to be a news
> > item at some point of time.
>
> I think we'll remove it in lilypond 3.0, as part of the GLISS
> changes. Granted, this is probably 18 months in the future.
Hmm, with such a time horizon, I'm beginning to think about the \cresc, \dim
and \decresc text commands again. Shall we really wait that long?
Cheers,
Reinhold
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFLzdbRTqjEwhXvPN0RAsUaAJ9ICPNoI0ClcT62YZr/P5YmUqxZQgCeNyME
7312KJsi13KkFFxRhtqVKMg=
=HT4d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change (was: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?), (continued)
- Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change (was: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?), David Kastrup, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change (was: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax?), Graham Percival, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, David Kastrup, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/19
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, David Kastrup, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, David Kastrup, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change,
Reinhold Kainhofer <=
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Graham Percival, 2010/04/20
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/04/21
- Re: Patch for LaTeX lilypond-syntax change, John Mandereau, 2010/04/20