[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Python 3
|
From: |
Dan Eble |
|
Subject: |
Re: Python 3 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:12:28 -0400 |
On Sep 30, 2019, at 14:22, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> But I don't see
> that a clean cut from Python2 to Python3 in a single step is easily
> feasible and testable for all targets at once including all GUB targets.
OK.
On Sep 27, 2019, at 16:34, Matthew Peveler <address@hidden> wrote:
> The primary thing missing is making
> the stepmake/stepmake/python-module-*.make files work for the range of
> versions, but I'm afraid that is out of my wheel house of ability.
Matt, I might be able to help with this, but can you describe more specifically
what is lacking? When your py changes are done, will the current makefiles
continue to work in environments with Python 2, but require updates to work in
environments with Python 3?
Regards,
—
Dan
- Re: Python 3, (continued)
Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/23
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/23
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2019/09/26
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/27
- Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Dan Eble, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, David Kastrup, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3,
Dan Eble <=
- Re: Python 3, Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Dan Eble, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/30
- Re: Python 3, Dan Eble, 2019/09/30
Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Joram, 2019/09/30
Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?), Matthew Peveler, 2019/09/30
Re: 2.20 where are we?, David Kastrup, 2019/09/21