Re: SMuFL name mapping update, 8 September

[Werner LEMBERG]

>> * About the rotated wiggle glyphs in Bravura: Do you have any idea
>>   why this is so?  If not, can you please ask the SMuFL people?  It
>>   looks definitely wrong to me!  They should either correct the
>>   font or provide glyph name aliases for horizontal typesetting
>>   (assuming that glyph names, once introduced, can't be changed any
>>   longer).  [...]
>
> I don't know... the SMuFL specs don't seem to say anything about it.
> I'll message their list when I get the time.

Thanks in advance!

>> * In your table I don't see a Bravura glyph
>>   `ornamentZigZagLineShortened`.  Is it really shortened that much
>>   so that you no longer can see it? :-)
> 
> Nope! `ornamentZigZagLineShortened` is a name I thought up in lieu
> of a SMuFL equivalent.  It's a limitation of my coloring system that
> all contentious mappings, whether suggested new glyphs or existing
> bravura glyphs, show up the same red color.

Ah, ok.

> Anyone object to calling it `ornamentZigZagLineAlt` until further
> notice?

This is fine with me.


    Werner