[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Frescobaldi] Re: Mac testers needed for Frescobaldi!

From: Paul Morris
Subject: Re: [Frescobaldi] Re: Mac testers needed for Frescobaldi!
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 06:29:24 -0700 (PDT)

jeff235 wrote
> On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 2:46:08 PM UTC+2, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
>> Or just communicating with the QuickTime synthesizer directly?
> Sure, whatever works. (I just thought the combination I mentioned sounded 
> better.)

+1, especially if MIDI playback that works "out-of-the-box" is just as easy
(or easier?) to do than getting Frescobaldi to see the MIDI ports provided
by SimpleSynth or FluidSynth (the current problem).

jeff235 wrote
>> That may not be a bad idea.  But then how would you handle Lilypond 
>> upgrades? 
> People could always install newer versions and add them in Preferences > 
> LilyPond Preferences. Frescobaldi already handles multiple versions of 
> LilyPond intelligently, which is helpful.

Yes, and also wouldn't it work to just include a new stable release of
LilyPond in a new release of Frescobaldi?  At least for those who are using
the stable releases.  

Or I just saw Urs' message with a different idea...

At any rate this could be a future addition (in one way or another) after
the initial "1.0" release of the mac app bundle.


View this message in context:
Sent from the User mailing list archive at

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]