Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: linus talk on git

[Brian May]

>>>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Stephens <address@hidden> writes:

    Bruce> Probably more of a win to have a combined
    Bruce> date+author+branch+changelog kind of cert thing (since
    Bruce> that's what you want on almost all revisions) such as has
    Bruce> been suggested before.

That would be good.

Having separate certificates for each purpose means it is not possible
to track, for example, when or why a particular revision was added to
a given branch. Having a branch certificate also include a date
certificate and a changelog would help, I think.

Not sure what use the author field is - presumably that could also be
determined from the signature?
-- 
Brian May <address@hidden>