[Monotone-devel] Re: linus talk on git

[Bruce Stephens]

Graydon Hoare <address@hidden> writes:

> Thomas Moschny wrote:
>
>> Having combined certs would solve that problem at the cost of
>> sometimes storing the same information twice: e.g. when two people
>> do the same merge, there will be two certs with different
>> dates/authors, but identical branch names and commit messages. But
>> that's reasonable anyway.
>
> Agreed. I meant to make this change for years, but have been holding
> off to synchronize the change with the change to policy
> branches. Perhaps they can be done independently, though.

I think your decision's probably right; I doubt the combined cert idea
is valuable enough to make on its own.