>>>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Stephens <address@hidden> writes:
Bruce> Probably more of a win to have a combined
Bruce> date+author+branch+changelog kind of cert thing (since
Bruce> that's what you want on almost all revisions) such as has
Bruce> been suggested before.
That would be good.
Having separate certificates for each purpose means it is not possible
to track, for example, when or why a particular revision was added to
a given branch. Having a branch certificate also include a date
certificate and a changelog would help, I think.
Not sure what use the author field is - presumably that could also be
determined from the signature?