[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: 0.92 amd64
From: |
Thomas Stein |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: 0.92 amd64 |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:52:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
Hello Duncan.
First, thanks for the very detailed answer.
> I'm guessing the problem is one of four things:
>
> (1) Missing a dep that the ebuild took care of for me. This one's likely
> /not/ the issue if you use GNOME.
Well, i used the ebuild. And as i said, the compile process start, but at some
point, its always the same point, when compiling scorefile.so or so, i don't
remember exactly everything goes "BANG!" I reported that error to
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128584 but they send me to this
list. :-) Oh, and by the way, this happens on both of my amd64 machines. I
have one at work and one at home.
> (1a) Missing a dep that's merged but wasn't detected as your environment
> wasn't setup to do so. More likely with GNOME, but again, should be
> solved by using the ebuild.
>
> (2) A difference in CXXFLAGS. The usual advice to cut back to a very
> basic "-march=k8 -O2 -pipe" if you have problems applies. Note here that
> unless you have them exported in your environment, your normal portage
> CFLAGS wouldn't be used if you didn't use the ebuild. It would have used
> a different, default set, which I've never verified to be suitable, but
> which probably uses a default "-march=x86_64" (not amd64 specific, not
> intel crap specific either, generic), and no optimization, which could
> affect things.
My CFLAGS are exactly the same as yours:
CFLAGS="-march=k8 -O2 -pipe"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
If you need more info just ask.
best regards
t.
- [Pan-users] 0.92 amd64, Thomas Stein, 2006/04/12
- [Pan-users] Re: 0.92 amd64, Duncan, 2006/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: 0.92 amd64,
Thomas Stein <=
- [Pan-users] Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Duncan, 2006/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Thomas Stein, 2006/04/13
- [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Duncan, 2006/04/13
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Thomas Stein, 2006/04/13
- [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Duncan, 2006/04/13
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Thomas Fricke, 2006/04/13
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Thomas Stein, 2006/04/13
- [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Duncan, 2006/04/14
- [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Duncan, 2006/04/14
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Thomas Stein, 2006/04/18